Predictors of micronutrient powder intake adherence in a pilot programme in Nepal

25Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Poor adherence to recommended intake protocols is common and a top challenge for micronutrient powder (MNP) programmes globally. Identifying modifiable predictors of intake adherence could inform the design and implementation of MNP projects. Design We assessed high MNP intake adherence among children who had received MNP ≥2 months ago and consumed ≥1 sachet (n 771). High MNP intake adherence was defined as maternal report of child intake ≥45 sachets. We used logistic regression to assess demographic, intervention components and perception-of-use factors associated with high MNP intake. Setting Four districts of Nepal piloting an integrated infant and young child feeding and MNP project. Subjects Children aged 6-23 months were eligible to receive sixty MNP sachets every 6 months with suggested intake of one sachet daily for 60 d. Cross-sectional surveys representative of children aged 6-23 months were conducted. Results Receiving a reminder card was associated with increased odds for high intake (OR=2·18, 95 % CI 1·14, 4·18); exposure to other programme components was not associated with high intake. Mothers perceiving ≥1 positive effects in their child after MNP use was also associated with high intake (OR=6·55, 95 % CI 4·29, 10·01). Perceiving negative affects was not associated; however, the child not liking the food with MNP was associated with lower odds of high intake (OR=0·12, 95 % CI 0·08, 0·20). Conclusions Behaviour change intervention strategies tailored to address these modifiable predictors could potentially increase MNP intake adherence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mirkovic, K. R., Perrine, C. G., Subedi, G. R., Mebrahtu, S., Dahal, P., Staatz, C., & Jefferds, M. E. D. (2016). Predictors of micronutrient powder intake adherence in a pilot programme in Nepal. Public Health Nutrition, 19(10), 1768–1776. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015003572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free