Static vs. Dynamic electrostatic repulsion reversed phase liquid chromatography: Solutions for pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical basic compounds

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many efforts have been made to separate basic compounds, which are challenging to resolve in reversed phase liquid chromatography. In this process, they are strongly retained and the peak shape undergoes significant distortion. The principal origin of this has been identified with the non-negligible interaction with residual deprotonated silanols. Consequently, all solutions that efficiently shield silanols are being sought. This review is an upgrade on the use of the electrostatic repulsion reversed phase (ERRP) approach: retention of bases, in protonated form, can be achieved by modulating the charge repulsion caused by the presence of positive charges in the chromatographic system. This study successfully (i) introduced fixed positive charges in the structure of stationary phases, (ii) used cationic and hydrophobic additives in the mobile phase, and (iii) used the ERRP-like approach employed at the preparative level for peptide purification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mazzoccanti, G., Gasparrini, F., Calcaterra, A., Villani, C., & Ciogli, A. (2021). Static vs. Dynamic electrostatic repulsion reversed phase liquid chromatography: Solutions for pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical basic compounds. Separations. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8050059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free