Counting houses of Pareto optimal matchings in the house allocation problem

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In an instance of the house allocation problem two sets A and B are given. The set A is referred to as applicants and the set B is referred to as houses. We denote by m and n the size of A and B respectively. In the house allocation problem, we assume that every applicant a ∈ A has a preference list over every house b ∈ B. We call an injective mapping τ from A to B a matching. A blocking coalition of τ is a subset A′ of A such that there exists a matching τ′ that differs from τ only on elements of A′, and every element of A′ improves in τ′, compared to τ according to its preference list. If there exists no blocking coalition, we call the matching τ an Pareto optimal matching (POM). A house b ∈ B is reachable if there exists a Pareto optimal matching using b. The set of all reachable houses is denoted by E*. We show (Formula Presented). This is asymptotically tight. A set E ⊆ B is reachable (respectively exactly reachable) if there exists a Pareto optimal matching τ whose image contains E as a subset (respectively equals E). We give bounds for the number of exactly reachable sets.We find that our results hold in the more general setting of multi-matchings, when each applicant a of A is matched with ℓa elements of B instead of just one. Further, we give complexity results and algorithms for corresponding algorithmic questions. Finally, we characterize unavoidable houses, i.e., houses that are used by all POM's. This yields efficient algorithms to determine all unavoidable elements. © 2014 Springer International Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Asinowski, A., Keszegh, B., & Miltzow, T. (2014). Counting houses of Pareto optimal matchings in the house allocation problem. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8496 LNCS, pp. 301–312). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07890-8_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free