Does landscape context mediate the nature of density dependence for a coral reef fish?

4Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over-harvest and landscape change are two of the greatest threats to marine ecosystems. Over-harvest may directly affect key population regulation mechanisms (e.g., density dependence), with the magnitude of the effects being further influenced by changes in landscape structure and associated resource availability. Because resource availability and conspecific density often co-vary within the natural landscape, manipulative experiments are needed to understand how changes in these two drivers may affect density dependence in wild populations. We used a common, shoaling, coral reef fish (white grunt, Haemulon plumierii) as our model species, and manipulated fish densities and landscape context of artificial reef habitats to assess the effects of each on fish condition. We found evidence of inverse density dependence, where individual condition was positively related to conspecific density; landscape context had little effect. Mean grunt condition on natural patch reefs was similar to that for our low grunt density treatment artificial reefs, possibly due to differences in fish densities or landscape context. These findings suggest that over-harvest may have detrimental effects on wild populations that extend beyond mere reductions in population size, especially for group-living species.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yeager, L. A., Stoner, E. W., Zapata, M. J., & Layman, C. A. (2014). Does landscape context mediate the nature of density dependence for a coral reef fish? Ecological Applications, 24(7), 1833–1841. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2231.1

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

68%

Researcher 12

32%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19

51%

Environmental Science 12

32%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

11%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0