Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: Impact of implementing government proposals

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: General practices in the UK receive incentive payments for managing patients with selected chronic conditions under the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scheme. Payments are made when a negotiated threshold percentage of patients receive the appropriate intervention. Aim: From 2013-2014 in England the Department of Health has proposed that this negotiated threshold is replaced with a value equal to the 75th percentile of national performance to attract maximum payments. This is an investigation of the potential impact of this change on practice income and workload. Design and setting: Analysis of 2011-2012 QOF dataset (the latest available) which covers 8123 GP practices and 55.5 million patients in England. Method: The 75th percentile of performance was calculated for 52 clinical indicators and applied to 2011-2012 performance. Estimations were made of financial and workload impacts on practices, and whether practices with different characteristics would be disproportionately affected. Results: The proposed changes will result in an increase in the upper payment threshold of each clinical indicator by a mean of 7.47% (range 2.16- 38.87%). If performance remains static practices would lose a mean of 47.68 (0-108.33) QOF points, equivalent to a mean financial change of -£279.60 (-£35 352.50 to +£19 957.78) per practice for these 52 indicators. Conclusion: Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold to the 75th percentile of national performance will, if clinical performance remains static, substantially reduce the mean number of QOF points achieved per practice. However, this translates into only a small mean loss of income per practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom

627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: Impact of the quality and outcomes framework-a systematic review

242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: Longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Setting performance targets in pay for performance programmes: What can we learn from QOF?

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: A longitudinal study

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caley, M., Burn, S., Rouse, A., & Marshall, T. (2014, January 1). Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: Impact of implementing government proposals. British Journal of General Practice. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X676465

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

21%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Psychology 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free