Value of Preoperative PET-CT in the Prediction of Pathological Stage of Gastric Cancer

25Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Preoperative precise staging is essential for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC); however, the diagnostic accuracy of conventional modalities needs to be increased. The present study investigated the clinical value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the staging of GC. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 117 patients with a clinical diagnosis of advanced GC who underwent PET-CT followed by gastrectomy. The incidence of FDG uptake in the primary tumor or lymph nodes and its relationship with clinicopathological factors, particularly pathological stage (pStage) III/IV, were examined. Results: FDG uptake in the primary tumor was noted in 83 patients (70.9%). FDG uptake in the lymph nodes was detected in 21 patients (17.9%), and its sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastasis were 22.7 and 90.5%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that FDG uptake in the primary tumor (odds ratio (OR) 2.764; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.104–7.459, p = 0.029) and that in the lymph nodes (OR 4.660; 95% CI 1.675–13.84, p = 0.003) were factors independently associated with pStage III/IV. FDG uptake in the primary tumor detected pStage III/IV with higher sensitivity (80.4%) and that in lymph nodes found pStage III/IV with higher specificity (88.7%) than those of upper endoscopy plus CT (60.9 and 67.6%, respectively). Conclusions: PET-CT appears to be a useful complementary modality in the assessment of pStage III/IV because of the high sensitivity of FDG uptake in the primary tumor and the high specificity of FDG uptake in the lymph nodes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kudou, M., Kosuga, T., Kubota, T., Okamoto, K., Komatsu, S., Shoda, K., … Otsuji, E. (2018). Value of Preoperative PET-CT in the Prediction of Pathological Stage of Gastric Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 25(6), 1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6455-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free