Publish, and be damned…

29Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent controversies over scientific fraud and other disputed findings have raised questions over the way in which journals select papers for publication. Is there a problem? And what more could be done to weed out dubious results? David Adam and Jonathan Knight investigate.

References Powered by Scopus

Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico

501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitation

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Suspect evidence of transgenic contamination

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A content analysis of referees' comments: How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Misconduct by researchers and authors

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adam, D., & Knight, J. (2002, October 24). Publish, and be damned…. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/419772a

Readers over time

‘10‘13‘17‘18‘20‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

50%

Materials Science 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Physics and Astronomy 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0