Negative emotional energy: A Theory of the "dark-side" of interaction ritual chains

43Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Randall Collins' theory of interaction ritual chains is widely cited, but has been subject to little theoretical elaboration. One reason for the modest expansion of the theory is the underdevelopment of the concept of emotional energy. This paper examines emotional energy, related particularly to the dynamics of negative experiences. It asks whether or not negative emotions produce emotional energies that are qualitatively distinct from their positive counterparts. The analysis begins by tracing the development of Interaction Ritual Theory, and summarizes its core propositions. Next, it moves to a conceptualization of a "valenced" emotional energy and describes both "positive" and "negative" dimensions. Six propositions outline the central dynamics of negative emotional energy. The role of groups in the formation of positive and negative emotional energy are considered, as well as how these energies are significant sources of sociological motivation.

References Powered by Scopus

The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior

2409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?

2398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intergroup bias

1806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new approach to understanding tourism practices

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social bonding in diplomacy

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opportunity creation: Entrepreneurial agency, interaction, and affect

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyns, D., & Luery, S. (2015). Negative emotional energy: A Theory of the “dark-side” of interaction ritual chains. Social Sciences, 4(1), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4010148

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

9%

Researcher 4

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 31

66%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

19%

Arts and Humanities 5

11%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free