Comparative evaluation of the marginal fit of inlays fabricated by conventional and digital impression techniques: A stereomicroscopic study

9Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Context: Marginal fit being the prime concern of indirect restorations. Inlays can be either fabricated by conventional technique or computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. CAD/CAM is the most evolving digital technique with faster, quicker, and precise results. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the marginal fit of MOD inlays fabricated with two different CAD/CAM methods and conventional fabrication methods. Settings and Design: Mesio-occlusal-distal preparation was done on a maxillary premolar typhodont tooth and divided into the following groups. Group A: 30 inlays were fabricated through the conventional impression technique. Group B: Preparation was scanning using an intraoral scanner followed by subtractive milling (Group B1) and subtractive milling of wax patterns (Group B2). Similarly, subgrouping was carried out for Group C except that an extraoral scanner was used. Occlusal and the cervical marginal fit were assessed using the replica technique and stereomicroscope. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test for determining differences at a 95% level of confidence (P = 0.05). Results: Group A had the highest marginal discrepancy in comparison to Group B and Group C at occlusal and cervical edges, whereas subtractive milling showed comparatively better results than subtractive milling of wax patterns at cervical edges and similar results at occlusal edges. Conclusions: Ceramic inlays fabricated by subtractive milling yielded better results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma, A., Abraham, D., Gupita, A., Singh, A., & Sharma, N. (2020). Comparative evaluation of the marginal fit of inlays fabricated by conventional and digital impression techniques: A stereomicroscopic study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 11(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_375_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free