Classroom-based corpus research into learner writing using both computational and manual text analysis can provide a starting point for shaping students' understanding of academic argumentation including metadiscourse. Following Mauranen (1993), Ädel's (2003) model delineates metadiscourse from evaluation, refocusing attention on explicit reflexive language. This study examines the use of metadiscourse in high-scoring and low-scoring essays written by undergraduate L2 business students. The subcategories studied are connectives, frame markers, code glosses and self-mentions. The results show striking differences in the range and use of markers to structure text. The wider aim of this study is to identify accessible models and methods to enable teachers to analyse metadiscourse in academic literacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Nordic Journal of English Studies is the property of Nordic Association of English Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
CITATION STYLE
Noble, W. (2010). Understanding Metadiscoursal Use: Lessons from a ‘Local’ Corpus of Learner Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.221
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.