Test-retest reliability and practice effects of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III

44Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although serial administration of cognitive tests is increasingly common, there is a paucity of research on test-retest reliabilities and practice effects, both of which are important for evaluating changes in functioning. Reliability is generally conceptualized as involving short-lasting changes in performance. However, when repeated testing occurs over a period of years, there will be some longer lasting effects. The implications of these longer lasting effects and practice effects on reliability were examined in the context of repeated administrations of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III in 339 community-dwelling women aged 40-79 years over 2 to 7 years. The results showed that Logical Memory and Verbal Paired Associates subtests were consistently the most reliable subtests across the age cohorts. The magnitude of practice effects varied as a function of subtests and age. The largest practice effects were found in the youngest age cohort, especially on the Faces, Logical Memory, and Verbal Paired Associates subtests. ©2012 The British Psychological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lo, A. H. Y., Humphreys, M., Byrne, G. J., & Pachana, N. A. (2012). Test-retest reliability and practice effects of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III. Journal of Neuropsychology, 6(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02023.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free