Bigger Isn’t Always Better: An Analysis of Court Efficiency Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling

  • Dalton T
  • Singer J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One important measure of trial court efficiency is overall case length—that is, the elapsed time from a case’s initial filing to its final disposition. Using a large, recent dataset from nearly 7000 federal civil cases, we find that two variables are particularly useful in predicting overall case length: the total number of attorneys filing an appearance in the case, and the number of authorized judgeships for a given district court. Further, we find a significant and surprising interaction between these two variables, indicating that smaller courts are more efficient than larger courts at processing civil cases when more than three attorneys appear in a case, but that the opposite holds true when three attorneys or fewer appear in a case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalton, T., & Singer, J. M. (2014). Bigger Isn’t Always Better: An Analysis of Court Efficiency Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Pace Law Review, 34(3), 1169. https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3528.1869

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free