Understanding Political Communication Styles in Televised Debates via Body Movements

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Televised political debates have received much attention by scholars in political communication and social psychology who study nonverbal cues in interpersonal communication and their impact on candidate evaluations. An abundance of political multimedia and new platforms have required leaders to develop an effective and unique communication “style” which may rely on nonverbal devices such as face and body. Emotions conveyed by expressive gestures of candidates during debates have been shown to elicit stronger reactions from the public than rhetorical statements alone. Candidates, for example, may exploit assertive and aggressive gestures to communicate their confidence and attract supporters. Existing studies, however, are based largely on manual coding of human gestures, which may not be scalable or reproducible. The main objectives of our paper are to investigate the role of body movements of candidates using a systematic and automated approach as well as understand the context and effects of gestures. For this analysis, we collected a dataset of political debate videos from the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries and analyzed facial expressions and gestures of candidates. Our preliminary analysis demonstrates that candidates employ gestures to varying extents, and the amount of body movement is correlated with emotions conveyed in the candidates’ facial expressions. We discuss our dataset, preliminary results, and future directions in the following sections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, Z., Indudhara, C., Mahorker, K., Bucy, E. P., & Joo, J. (2020). Understanding Political Communication Styles in Televised Debates via Body Movements. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12535 LNCS, pp. 788–793). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66415-2_55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free