Performance and Efficiency of Anionic Dishwashing Liquids with Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants

39Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Performance and efficiency of anionic [sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) and sodium α-olefin sulfonate (AOS)] and amphoteric [cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB)] as well as nonionic [cocodiethanol amide (DEA), various ethoxylated alcohols (C12-C15-7EO, C10-7EO and C9-C11-7EO) and lauramine oxide (AO)] surfactants in various dishwashing liquid mixed micelle systems have been studied at different temperatures (17.0, 23.0 and 42.0 °C). The investigated parameters were critical micelle concentration (CMC), surface tension (γ), cleaning performance and, foaming, biodegradability and irritability of anionic (SLES/AOS) and anionic/amphoteric/nonionic (SLES/AOS/CAB/AO) as well as anionic/nonionic (SLES/AOS/DEA/AO, SLES/AOS/C12-C15-7EO/AO, SLES/AOS/C10-7EO/AO and SLES/AOS/C9-C11-7EO/AO) dishwashing surfactant mixtures. In comparison to the starting binary SLES/AOS surfactant mixture, addition of various nonionic surfactants promoted CMC and γ lowering, enhanced cleaning performance and foaming, but did not significantly affect biodegradability and irritability of dishwashing formulations. The anionic/nonionic formulation SLES/AOS/C9-C11-7EO/AO shows both the lowest CMC and γ as well as the best cleaning performance, compared to the other examined dishwashing formulations. However, the results in this study reveal that synergistic behavior of anionic/nonionic SLES/AOS/ethoxylated alcohols/AO formulations significantly improves dishwashing performance and efficiency at both low and regular dishwashing temperatures (17.0 and 42.0 °C) and lead to better application properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blagojević, S. N., Blagojević, S. M., & Pejić, N. D. (2016). Performance and Efficiency of Anionic Dishwashing Liquids with Amphoteric and Nonionic Surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 19(2), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-015-1784-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free