Parental intimate partner homicide and its consequences for children: Protocol for a population-based study

15Citations
Citations of this article
155Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The loss of a parent due to intimate partner homicide has a major impact on children. Professionals involved have to make far-reaching decisions regarding placement, guardianship, mental health care and contact with the perpetrating parent, without an evidence base to guide these decisions. We introduce a study protocol to a) systematically describe the demographics, circumstances, mental health and wellbeing of children bereaved by intimate partner homicide and b) build a predictive model of factors associated with children's mental health and wellbeing after intimate partner homicide. Methods/Design: This study focuses on children bereaved by parental intimate partner homicide in the Netherlands over a period of 20 years (1993 - 2012). It involves an incidence study to identify all Dutch intimate partner homicide cases between 1993 and 2012 by which children have been bereaved; systematic case reviews to describe the demographics, circumstances and care trajectories of these children; and a mixed-methods study to assess mental health, wellbeing, and experiences regarding decisions made and care provided. Discussion: Clinical experience and initial research suggest that the children involved often need long-term intensive mental health and case management. The costs of these services are extensive and the stakes are high. This study lays the foundation for an international dataset and evidence-informed decision making.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alisic, E., Groot, A., Snetselaar, H., Stroeken, T., & van de Putte, E. (2015). Parental intimate partner homicide and its consequences for children: Protocol for a population-based study. BMC Psychiatry, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0565-z

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 61

73%

Researcher 10

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 50

54%

Social Sciences 17

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 11

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0