Spinal cord emergencies: False reassurance from reflexes

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Emergency physicians need to understand the potential for false reassurance in the interpretation of reflex examination data. Neurologic consultation should be sought when classic signs are lacking, but other evidence causes suspicion. Changes in teaching emphasis and acute practice are needed, since the stakes may be high and time is of the essence. We have responded to the insights gained from this study by augmenting in-service and continuing medical education teaching and by implementing guidelines to assist EPs. We have emphasized the importance of spotlighting high-risk patients, as exemplified above, and of taking advantage of neurologic or neurosurgical consultation. Where in-person consultation is less available, the use of guidelines and remote consultation should be able to help direct further examination, diagnostic formulation, and the need for imaging decisions. Given the potential for severe negative outcome if spinal emergencies are not optireally managed, we must give the teaching of these issues high priority.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glick, T. H., Workman, T. P., & Gaufberg, S. V. (1998). Spinal cord emergencies: False reassurance from reflexes. Academic Emergency Medicine, 5(10), 1041–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02787.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free