Comparison of work of breathing between noninvasive ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in a healthy and a lung-injured piglet model

4Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly used in neonates. A mode of NIV called neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) offers patient-ventilator interactions by using electrical activity of the diaphragm to control mechanical breaths. We hypothesized that the work of breathing (WOB) would decrease with NIV-NAVA. Secondary objectives evaluated the impact of NIV-NAVA on arterial blood gases and respiratory parameters. METHODS: We compared WOB between synchronized breaths in NIV-NAVA and NIV in piglets with healthy lungs and then with surfactant-depleted lungs. Neonatal pigs (median, 2.0 [range, 1.8–2.4] kg) with healthy and then surfactant depleted lungs were sedated and ventilated with NIV-NAVA and NIV in random order. Airway flow and pressure waveforms were acquired. Waveforms were analyzed for the pressure-time product that reflected WOB. The primary outcome between modes was assessed with repeated measurement analysis of variance. RESULTS: The pressure-time product was significantly decreased for NIV-NAVA in both healthy and injured lungs (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, M. L., Bai, S., Thurman, T. L., Holt, S. J., Heulitt, M. J., & Courtney, S. E. (2018). Comparison of work of breathing between noninvasive ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in a healthy and a lung-injured piglet model. Respiratory Care, 63(12), 1478–1484. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free