Silence is golden: Railroad noise pollution and property values

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper uses a unique dataset containing property values and manually collected noise measurements in Memphis, Tennessee to estimate the impact of train noise pollution on commercial and residential property values. Results show that a residential property exposed to 65 decibels or greater of railroad noise results in a 14 to 18 percent decrease in property value. Once a 65 decibel measure is included, there is no additional impact on price of distance to the closest railroad crossing. For commercial property, neither crossing proximity nor noise level significantly affect property value. The results provide evidence of a negative externality that is created by railroad noise for households and the need for more exact measures of noise levels. The findings are also consistent with previous literature suggesting firms have different ideas than individuals about desirable locational attributes.

References Powered by Scopus

Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice

2123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education

939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Noise exposure and public health

789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How does high-speed rail affect land value? Evidence from China

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is the light rail “Tide” lifting property values? Evidence from Hampton Roads, VA

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Causal, spatiotemporal impacts of transit investments: Exploring spatial heterogeneity from announcement through long-run operation

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, J. K. (2016). Silence is golden: Railroad noise pollution and property values. Review of Regional Studies, 46(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

50%

Engineering 2

25%

Computer Science 1

13%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free