The thompson-mcfadden commission and joseph goldberger: Contrasting 2 historical investigations of pellagra in cotton mill villages in south carolina

16Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As pellagra reached epidemic proportions in the United States in the early 20th century, 2 teams of investigators assessed its incidence in cotton mill villages in South Carolina. The first, the Thompson-McFadden Commission, concluded that pellagra was likely infectious. The second, a Public Health Service investigation led by Joseph Goldberger, concluded that pellagra was caused by a dietary deficiency. In this paper, we recount the history of the 2 investigations and consider how the differences between the 2 studies' designs, measurements, analyses, and interpretations led to different conclusions. Because the novel dietary assessment strategy was a key feature of the Public Health Service's study design, we incorporated simulated measurement error in a reanalysis of the Public Health Service's data to assess whether this specific difference affected the divergent conclusions. © The Author 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mooney, S. J., Knox, J., & Morabia, A. (2014). The thompson-mcfadden commission and joseph goldberger: Contrasting 2 historical investigations of pellagra in cotton mill villages in south carolina. American Journal of Epidemiology, 180(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free