Traditions of inquiry: Should we talk of different paradigms after all?

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Much educational research, particularly at PhD level, is premised on there being a deep division between qualitative and quantitative research. Indeed these are seen to follow from different and incompatible paradigms of what counts as truth and knowledge. This response to Alexander's chapter further questions the tenability of this dichotomy. There are different kinds of research, the methodology depending on the questions being asked.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pring, R. (2014). Traditions of inquiry: Should we talk of different paradigms after all? In A Companion to Research in Education (Vol. 9789400768093, pp. 27–30). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free