Efficacy and safety of iota-carrageenan nasal spray versus placebo in early treatment of the common cold in adults: The ICICC trial

83Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Iota-carrageenan (I-C) is active against respiratory viruses in vitro and was effective as nasal spray in three previous clinical trials. The current trial served to further investigate I-C in patients with early common cold symptoms. Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase IV trial was conducted in 200 adult patients with self-diagnosed colds of < 48 h' duration that were confirmed by baseline cold symptom scores. Patients were to self-administer 0.12 % I-C or placebo spray (NaCl 0.5 %) four times daily for four to ten days and record symptom information for ten days. Common respiratory viruses were quantified by RT-PCR during pretreatment and on Day 3 or 4. The primary endpoint was the mean total symptom score (TSS) of eight cold symptoms on Days 2-4 (TSS2-4). Results: Patients in both treatment groups had similar baseline TSSs (mean TSS: 6.75 for I-C and 6.79 for placebo). Viruses were detected in baseline samples from 53 of 98 I-C patients (54.1 %) and 54 of 97 placebo patients (55.7 %). Mean ± SE for TSS2-4 was 5.78 ± 0.25 for I-C patients and 6.39 ± 0.25 for placebo (p = 0.0895). Exploratory analyses after unblinding (TSS2-4 excluding a patient with aberrantly high symptom scores [TSS2-4, ex 1pt]; mean of TSS over Days 1-4 [TSS1-4]; change in TSS1-4 relative to baseline [TSS1-4, rel]) demonstrated treatment differences in favor of I-C (p = 0.0364, p = 0.0495 and p = 0.0421, respectively). For patients with quantifiable rhinovirus/enterovirus at baseline, there was a trend towards greater reduction of virus load at Day 3 or 4 (p = 0.0958; I-C: 90.2 % reduction in viral load; placebo: 72.0 %). Treatments were well tolerated with no differences in adverse event rates. Conclusions: The primary endpoint did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between I-C and placebo but showed a trend towards I-C benefit. Exploratory analyses indicated significant reduction of cold symptoms in the I-C group relative to placebo during the first four days when symptoms were most severe, and also substantiated I-C's activity against rhinovirus/enterovirus.

References Powered by Scopus

The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States

693Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Viruses and bacteria in the etiology of the common cold

629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carrageenan is a potent inhibitor of papillomavirus infection

435Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Carrageenan: Drug delivery systems and other biomedical applications

262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of marine natural products in drug research

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Decoding antioxidant and antibacterial potentials of Malaysian green seaweeds: Caulerpa racemosa and caulerpa lentillifera

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eccles, R., Winther, B., Johnston, S. L., Robinson, P., Trampisch, M., & Koelsch, S. (2015). Efficacy and safety of iota-carrageenan nasal spray versus placebo in early treatment of the common cold in adults: The ICICC trial. Respiratory Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0281-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

46%

Researcher 24

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

37%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 12

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

22%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 10

19%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 79

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free