Effects of polydispersity on hard sphere crystals

130Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We use simple models and molecular dynamics simulations to determine the effects of polydispersity δ on the equation of state for hard sphere crystals. Experiments show that the osmotic pressure for poly-(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) spheres with a poly-(12-hydroxy stearic acid) (PHSA) layer with a 5% polydispersity exceeds the value expected for hard spheres as the volume fraction φ increases, particularly for φ>0.60. Mean field theory predicts a higher osmotic pressure with increasing polydispersity, but the effects are only significant for δ>0.10. Molecular dynamics simulations with δ=0.05 bound the equation of state between a metastable disordered upper limit and a crystalline organized polydisperse (possibly) lower limit. The pressure for the PMMA-PHSA spheres lies close to the organized polydisperse limit, indicating a preference for a crystalline ordered arrangement where smaller particles surround larger ones. Thus, the higher osmotic pressure seen in the equation of state of PMMA-PHSA spheres is a direct effect of polydispersity, manifest as a pronounced reduction in the crystalline close packed volume fraction from φmax(FCC, δ=0)=0.7404 to φmax(FCC, δ=0.1)=0.665. The random close packing φmax(RCP) is almost independent of polydispersity. This leads to a crossing of values of φmax(FCC) and φmax(RCP) and hence a possible terminal polydispersity of 0.12±0.01, consistent with other simulations, theories, and experiments. Since our results do not include size fractionation of the liquid and solid, the exact meaning of this crossing is unclear and its agreement with previously reported terminal polydispersities may be coincidental. © 1998 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phan, S. E., Russel, W. B., Zhu, J., & Chaikin, P. M. (1998). Effects of polydispersity on hard sphere crystals. Journal of Chemical Physics, 108(23), 9789–9795. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476453

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free