Experimentally reduced root-microbe interactions reveal limited plasticity in functional root traits in Acer and Quercus

13Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and AimsInteractions between roots and soil microbes are critical components of below-ground ecology. It is essential to quantify the magnitude of root trait variation both among and within species, including variation due to plasticity. In addition to contextualizing the magnitude of plasticity relative to differences between species, studies of plasticity can ascertain if plasticity is predictable and whether an environmental factor elicits changes in traits that are functionally advantageous.MethodsTo compare functional traits and trait plasticities in fine root tissues with natural and reduced levels of colonization by microbial symbionts, trimmed and surface-sterilized root segments of 2-year-old Acer rubrum and Quercus rubra seedlings were manipulated. Segments were then replanted into satellite pots filled with control or heat-treated soil, both originally derived from a natural forest. Mycorrhizal colonization was near zero in roots grown in heat-treated soil; roots grown in control soil matched the higher colonization levels observed in unmanipulated root samples collected from field locations.Key ResultsBetween-treatment comparisons revealed negligible plasticity for root diameter, branching intensity and nitrogen concentration across both species. Roots from treated soils had decreased tissue density (approx. 10-20 %) and increased specific root length (approx. 10-30 %). In contrast, species differences were significant and greater than treatment effects in traits other than tissue density. Interspecific trait differences were also significant in field samples, which generally resembled greenhouse samples.ConclusionsThe combination of experimental and field approaches was useful for contextualizing trait plasticity in comparison with inter- and intra-specific trait variation. Findings that root traits are largely species dependent, with the exception of root tissue density, are discussed in the context of current literature on root trait variation, interactions with symbionts and recent progress in standardization of methods for quantifying root traits. © 2013 © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

References Powered by Scopus

The worldwide leaf economics spectrum

7372Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION IN ROOTS

4816Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits

3559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patterns in root traits of woody species hosting arbuscular and ectomycorrhizas: Implications for the evolution of belowground strategies

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seasonal variation in chemistry, but not morphology, in roots of Quercus robur growing in different soil types

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, M. H., Comas, L. H., & Callahan, H. S. (2014). Experimentally reduced root-microbe interactions reveal limited plasticity in functional root traits in Acer and Quercus. Annals of Botany, 113(3), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct276

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

61%

Researcher 9

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27

63%

Environmental Science 13

30%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

5%

Engineering 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free