Factores que determinan la alta satisfacción del usuario con la asistencia hospitalaria

14Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To identify the influence of sociodemographic, care and communication factors on patient satisfaction. Methods. Cross-sectional study by means of a telephonic survey of patients discharged during September, 2006. Instrument for measuring satisfaction: SERQVHOS questionnaire. Statistical analysis: we used odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI); adjustment for confusion factors was performed using multiple logistic regression. Results. Response rate was 80.9%. On evaluating the influence of sociodemographic characteristics, we observed that patients whose nationality did not correspond to the European Union were more satisfied than Spanish patients (OR=3.01; 95% CI: 1.40-3.51); subjects who had only completed primary studies were more satisfied than those with university studies (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.88-4.35). With respect to care factors, patients readmitted because of the same major diagnostic category had lower satisfaction (OR=0.67, bordering statistical significance). Finally, with regard to communication factors, the three aspects most associated with patient satisfaction were: correct health-care personnel identification (OR: 6.22 95% CI: 3.52-10.97), receiving enough information about his/her state of health (OR: 3.83 95% CI: 1.94- 7.57), and being informed about the place and schedule for medical information (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.60-4.22). Conclusions. Communication favourably affects the final perception of care, which justifies the continuity of its improvement in the health centres of our region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dierssen-Sotos, T., Rodríguez-Cundín, P., Robles-García, M., Brugos-Llamazares, V., Gómez-Acebo, I., & Llorca, J. (2009). Factores que determinan la alta satisfacción del usuario con la asistencia hospitalaria. Anales Del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 32(SUPPL.3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1137-66272009000500002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free