Unveiling the Links Between Peptide Identification and Differential Analysis FDR Controls by Means of a Practical Introduction to Knockoff Filters

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In proteomic differential analysis, FDR control is often performed through a multiple test correction (i.e., the adjustment of the original p-values). In this protocol, we apply a recent and alternative method, based on so-called knockoff filters. It shares interesting conceptual similarities with the target–decoy competition procedure, classically used in proteomics for FDR control at peptide identification. To provide practitioners with a unified understanding of FDR control in proteomics, we apply the knockoff procedure on real and simulated quantitative datasets. Leveraging these comparisons, we propose to adapt the knockoff procedure to better fit the specificities of quantitative proteomic data (mainly very few samples). Performances of knockoff procedure are compared with those of the classical Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, hereby shedding a new light on the strengths and weaknesses of target–decoy competition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Etourneau, L., Varoquaux, N., & Burger, T. (2023). Unveiling the Links Between Peptide Identification and Differential Analysis FDR Controls by Means of a Practical Introduction to Knockoff Filters. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 2426, pp. 1–24). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1967-4_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free