Adverse events in Spanish intensive care units: The SYREC study

59Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence and characteristics of adverse events (AEs) and no-harm events (NHEs) in critically ill patients. Design: Observational, prospective, 24-h cross-sectional study with self-reporting. Setting: Seventy-nine intensive care units at 76 hospitals. Measurements: Number of events, risk of AEs and NHEs, types of incidents, severity and avoidability of incidents. Results: A total of 1017 patients were included in the study; 591 (58%) were affected by one or more incidents. Of the 1424 valid incidents, 943 (66%) were NHEs and 481 (34%) were AEs. The individual risk of suffering at least one incident was 62%, at least one NHE 45% and at least one AE 29%. The median number of incidents, NHEs and AEs was 6, 3 and 2 per 100 patient-hours, respectively. Seventy-four per cent of the incidents were related to medication (24%), equipment (15%), nursing care (14%), accidental withdrawal of vascular accesses and catheters (10%) or airways and mechanical ventilation (10%). AEs resulted in temporary damage in 29% and in permanent damage or damage that compromised patients' lives or contributed to their death in 4%. Incidents were avoidable in 79% of cases (90% in NHEs and 60% in AEs, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The individual risk for incidents in critical patients is high. Many incidents did not harm patients, some caused damage and a few were related to the patient's death. Most incidents were considered avoidable. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merino, P., Álvarez, J., Martín, M. C., Alonso, Á., & Gutiérrez, I. (2012). Adverse events in Spanish intensive care units: The SYREC study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzr083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free