Efficacy of bilevel-auto treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea not responsive to or intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation

28Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, it was recently suggested that a novel mode of ventilation, Bilevel-auto, could be equally effective in treating patients unable to tolerate CPAP. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of Bilevel-auto to treat OSA patients whose nocturnal ventilatory disturbances are not completely corrected by CPAP. Methods: We enrolled 66 consecutive OSA patients, not responsive to (group A) or intolerant of (group B) CPAP treatment, after a full night of manual CPAP titration in a laboratory. Full polysomnography data and daytime sleepiness score were compared for each group in the three different conditions: basal, during CPAP, and during Bilevel-auto. Results: The apnea-hypopnea index decreased signifi cantly during CPAP in both groups; however, in the group A, there was a further signifi cant improvement during Bilevel-auto. The same trend was observed for oxygenation indices, while the distribution and the effi ciency of sleep did not differ following the switch from CPAP to Bilevel-auto. Conclusions: This study confi rmed the role of Bilevel-auto as an effective therapeutic alternative to CPAP in patients intolerant of this latter mode of ventilation. Moreover, extending the use of Bilevel-auto to those OSA patients not responsive to CPAP, we showed a signifi cantly better correction of nocturnal respiratory disturbances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlucci, A., Ceriana, P., Mancini, M., Cirio, S., Pierucci, P., Lupo, N. D. A., … Fanfulla, F. (2015). Efficacy of bilevel-auto treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea not responsive to or intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(9), 981–985. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.5008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free