Monetary policy and commodity futures

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper constructs daily measures of the real interest rate and expected inflation using commodity futures prices and the term structure of Treasury yields. We find that commodity futures markets respond to surprise increases in the federal funds rate target by raising the inflation rate expected over the next 3 to 9 months. There is no evidence that the real interest rate responds to surprises in the federal funds target. The data from the commodity futures markets are highly volatile; we show that one can substantially reduce the noise using limited information estimators such as the median change. Nevertheless, the basket of commodities actually traded daily is quite narrow and we do not know whether our observable rates are closely connected to the unobservable inflation and real rates that affect economywide consumption and investment decisions. © 2005, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

References Powered by Scopus

Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the Fed funds futures market

905Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying VARS based on high frequency futures data

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Commodity own rates, real interest rates, and money supply announcements

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Macroeconomic Determinants of Commodity Futures Returns

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Trader's Guide to Key Economic Indicators: Third Edition

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monetary Policy Announcements and Short-Term Interest Rate Futures Volatility: Evidence from the Mexican Market

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armesto, M. T., & Gavin, W. T. (2005). Monetary policy and commodity futures. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87(3), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.87.395-406

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

56%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

22%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Arts and Humanities 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free