Technical performance and reflection capacity of the anaesthetic conserving device - A bench study with isoflurane and sevoflurane

38Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The anaesthetic conserving device (AnaConDa®, Sedana Medical, Sundbyberg, Sweden) facilitates administration of isoflurane or sevoflurane by liquid infusion. An anaesthetic reflector inside the device conserves exhaled anaesthetic and re-supplies it during inspiration. In this bench study, we examined the influence of infusion rates and ventilatory settings on the resulting anaesthetic concentrations on patient (Cpat) and ventilator side of the reflector (Closs) to describe its technical performance. Methods: A Puritan Bennett 840 ICU ventilator (Pleasanton, US), AnaConDa®, and a test lung (3 l-chloroprene-bag) were assembled. Infusion rates (IR, 0.2-50 ml h-1), respiratory rates (RR, 5-40 breaths min-1), and tidal volumes (VT, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 l) were varied. Cpat was measured via a thin catheter in the middle of the 3 l-bag in steady state (online data storage and averaging over >10 min). Closs was calculated from IR (to yield the volume of vapour per unit of time), and expired minute volume (in which the vapour is diluted) on the assumption that, in the steady state, input by liquid infusion equals output through the reflector. Results: At lower concentrations (Cpat < 1 vol%) the ratio Closs/Cpat was constant (RC = 0.096 ± 0.012) for all combinations of IR, RR and VT, both for isoflurane and sevoflurane. The device could efficiently reflect up to 10 ml vapour per breath (e.g. 2 vol% in 0.5 l). When exceeding this capacity, surplus vapour "spilled over" and RC markedly increased indicating decreased performance. Conclusions: The triple product minute volume times RC times Cpat describes anaesthetic losses through the reflector. It can easily be calculated as long as the 10 ml reflection capacity is not exceeded and thus RC is constant. Increased minute ventilation necessitates increasing the IR to keep Cpat constant. When using large VT and high Cpat "spill over" occurs. This effect offers some protection against an inadvertent overdose. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meiser, A., Bellgardt, M., Belda, J., Röhm, K., Laubenthal, H., & Sirtl, C. (2009). Technical performance and reflection capacity of the anaesthetic conserving device - A bench study with isoflurane and sevoflurane. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 23(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9158-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free