Modeling the irradiance dependency of the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis

44Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Measures of the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis (φ PSII) across an irradiance (E) gradient are an increasingly common physiological assay and alternative to traditional photosynthetic-irradiance (PE) assays. Routinely, the analysis and interpretation of these data are analogous to PE measurements. Relative electron transport rates (rETR = E ∞ φ PSII) are computed and fit to a PE curve to retrieve physiologically meaningful PE parameters. This widespread approach is statistically flawed as the response variable (rETR) is explicitly dependent on the predictor variable (E). Alternatively the E-dependency of φ PSII can be modeled directly while retaining the desired PE parameters by normalizing a given PE model to E. This manuscript presents a robust analysis in support of this alternative procedure. First, we demonstrate that scaling φ PSII to rETR unnecessarily amplifies the measurement error of φ PSII and using a Monte-Carlo analysis on synthetic data induces significantly higher uncertainty in computed PE parameters relative to modeling the E-dependency of φ PSII directly. Next a large dataset is simultaneously fitted to four PE models implemented in their original and E-normalized forms. Four statistical criteria used to evaluate the efficacy of nonlinear models demonstrate improved model fits and more precise PE parameters when data are modeled as E-dependent changes in φ PSII. The analysis presented in this manuscript clearly demonstrates that modeling the E-dependency of φ PSII directly should be the norm for interpreting active fluorescence measures. © 2012 by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silsbe, G. M., & Kromkamp, J. C. (2012). Modeling the irradiance dependency of the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 10(SEPTEMBER), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.645

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free