Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomised controlled trial

91Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We randomised a total of 94 patients with longstanding moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) into a surgical group and a non-operative group, with 50 and 44 patients, respectively. The operative treatment comprised undercutting laminectomy of stenotic segments, augmented with transpedicular-instrumented fusion in suspected lumbar instability. The primary outcome was the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the other main outcomes included assessments of leg and back pain and self-reported walking ability, all based on questionnaire data from 85 patients at the 6-year follow-up. At the 6-year follow-up, the mean difference in ODI in favour of surgery was 9.5 (95% confidence interval 0.9-18.1, P-value for global difference 0.006), whereas the intensity of leg or back pain did not differ between the two treatment groups any longer. Walking ability did not differ between the treatment groups at any time. Decompressive surgery of LSS provided modest but consistent improvement in functional ability, surpassing that obtained after non-operative measures. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slätis, P., Malmivaara, A., Heliövaara, M., Sainio, P., Herno, A., Kankare, J., … Hurri, H. (2011). Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomised controlled trial. European Spine Journal, 20(7), 1174–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1652-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free