DFA minimization is a central problem in algorithm design and is based on the notion of DFA equivalence: Two DFA's are equivalent if and only if they accept the same set of strings. In this paper, we propose a new notion of DFA equivalence (that we call weak-equivalence): We say that two DFA's are weakly equivalent if they both accept the same number of strings of length k for every k. The motivation for this problem is as follows. A large number of counting problems can be solved by encoding the combinatorial objects we want to count as strings over a finite alphabet. If the collection of encoded strings is accepted by a DFA, then standard algorithms from computational linear algebra can be used to solve the counting problem efficiently. When applying this approach to largwe-scale applications, the bottleneck is the space complexity since the computation involves a matrix of order k × k if k is the size of the underlying DFA M. This leads to the natural question: Is there a smaller DFA that is weakly equivalent to M? We present an algorithm of time complexity O(k2) to find a compact DFA equivalent to a given DFA. We illustrate, in the case of tiling problem, that our algorithm reduces a (strongly minimal) DFA by a factor close to 2. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.
CITATION STYLE
Ravikumar, B. (2003). Weak minimization of DFA - An algorithm and applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2759, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45089-0_21
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.