Fractal dimension analysis on CBCT scans for detecting low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the fractal dimension (FD) measured at 2 bone sites (second cervical vertebra and mandible) on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The research question was whether FD could serve as an accessory tool to refer postmenopausal women for densitometric analysis. Therefore, the reliability and accuracy of FD were evaluated. Materials and Methods: In total, 103 postmenopausal women were evaluated, of whom 52 had normal bone mineral density and 51 had osteoporosis, according to dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine and hip. On the CBCT scans, 2 regions of interest were selected for FD analysis: 1 at the second cervical vertebra and 1 located at the mandible. The correlations between both measurements, intraand inter-observer agreement, and the accuracy of the measurements were calculated. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance for all tests. Results: The mean FD values were significantly lower at the mandibular region of interest in osteoporotic patients than in individuals with normal bone mineral density. The areas under the curve were 0.644 (P= 0.008) and 0.531 (P= 0.720) for the mandibular and vertebral sites, respectively. Conclusion: FD at the vertebral site could not be used as an adjuvant tool to refer women for osteoporosis investigation. Although FD differed between women with normal BMD and osteoporosis at the mandibular site, it demonstrated low accuracy and reliability. (Imaging Sci Dent 20210172)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carvalho, B. F., de Castro, J. G. K., de Melo, N. S., de Souza Figueiredo, P. T., Moreira-Mesquita, C. R., de Paula, A. P., … Leite, A. F. (2022). Fractal dimension analysis on CBCT scans for detecting low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 52, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5624/ISD.20210172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free