Double labeling and comparison of fuorescence intensity and photostability between quantum dots and FITC in oral tumors

21Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of quantum dots (Qds) and the FITC labeling technique in Tca8113 cells, and to compare the fuorescence intensity and photostability of these techniques. First, using one-colour confocal microscopy, Qds and FITC were applied separately to tag HSP70 in Tca8113 strains with indirect immunofluorescence. The expression of HSP70 in Tca8113 cells was observed using confocal laser microscopy, and the fluorescence intensity between Qds and FITC was compared. Using two-colour confocal microscopy, Qds and FITC were applied to tag survivin and HSP70, respectively, in order to compare the fuorescence photostability between QDs and FITC. Using a laser scanning microscope, survivin and HSP70 expression was clearly detected in the Tca8113 cells. The strength of the fuorescence signal from QDs was higher than that from FITC. after 40 min of continuous laser exposure, there was no observable decline in the QD fluorescent markers, whereas the FITC fluorescent signals faded very quickly and became undetectable. QDs have better fuorescence intensity and photostability than FITC, and are more appropriate for studies that require a long dynamic observation of physiological changes in cells.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
123Citations
248Readers

This article is free to access.

46Citations
96Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, J. J., Chen, J., Wang, Z. P., Pan, J., & Huang, Y. H. (2011). Double labeling and comparison of fuorescence intensity and photostability between quantum dots and FITC in oral tumors. Molecular Medicine Reports, 4(3), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2011.457

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

90%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

30%

Physics and Astronomy 2

20%

Materials Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0