Computational Radiology for Orthopaedic Interventions

  • Fürnstahl P
  • Schweizer A
  • Graf M
  • et al.
ISSN: 22129413
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pelvic osteotomies improve containment of the femoral head in cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip or in femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. In the evolution of osteotomies, the Ganz Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) is among the complex reorientation osteotomies and allows for complete mobilization of the acetabulum without compromising the integrity of the pelvic ring. For the complex reorientation osteotomies, preoperative planning of the required acetabular correction is an important step, due to the need to comprehend the three-dimensional (3D) relationship between acetabulum and femur. Traditionally, planning was performed using conventional radiographs in different projections, reducing the 3D problem to a two-dimensional one. Known disturbance variables, mainly tilt and rotation of the pelvis make assessment by these means approximate at the most. The advent of modern enhanced computation skills and new imaging techniques gave room for more sophisticated means of preoperative planning. Apart from analysis of acetabular geometry on conventional x-rays by sophisticated software applications, more accurate assessment of coverage and congruency and thus amount of correction necessary can be performed on multiplanar CT images. With further evolution of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery, especially the ability to generate 3D models from the CT data, examiners were enabled to simulate the in vivo situation in a virtual in vitro setting. Based on this ability, different techniques have been described. They basically all employ virtual definition of an acetabular fragment. Subsequently reorientation can be simulated using either 3D calculation of standard parameters of femoroacetabular morphology, or joint contact pressures, or a combination of both. Other techniques employ patient specific implants, templates or cutting guides to achieve the goal of safe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fürnstahl, P., Schweizer, A., Graf, M., Vlachopoulos, L., Fucentese, S., & Wirth, S. (2016). Computational Radiology for Orthopaedic Interventions. Computational Radiology for Orthopaedic Interventions, 23, 123–149. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-23482-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free