Reading: How Readers Beget Imagining

16Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We trace reading to an embodied synthetic process that drives the rapid scales of imagining. As sensorimotor engagement with written artifacts permeates experience, it sharpens the sensibility that brings forth understanding. We thus trace material engagement with written artifacts to fine control over saccadic eye movements and voicing that draws on humans or what the Greeks knew as aisthesis. In reading, we identify aisthesis in how prereflective judgments punctuate the flow of engagement with written documents. While the study of reading often begins with “texts,” we start with how written artifacts are put to use. We use cognitive ethnography to trace reading to how fine multiscalar coordination enables readers to engage with written artifacts such as books. Our ethnography of reading provides descriptions of how readers use sensorimotor activity to integrate understanding with saccading and actual or imagined vocalization in ways that show how reading connects sensorimotor schemata with highly skilled use of written artifacts. By pursuing the power of rapid multiscalar dynamics, we complement views of reading as slow-scale subjective experience. Rather than focus on interaction between a reader and an imagined author, we turn to coordinating with an affordance-rich environment. Human prereflective judgments demonstrably use collective experience with written signs. In fine-grained analysis of authentic data, we therefore track kinesthetic experience to how a child’s vocalizations beget understanding and, at once, imagining. These observations show how engagement brings life to written signs by connecting other peoples’ pasts with the use of gaze, gesture, voice, and touch. While describing saccades and bursts of vocalizing, we reach beyond analogies with interaction and, in so doing, the multiscalar approach takes enactive-ecological work beyond the slow interactional and social scales or reported experience. Imagining arises as readers use multiscalar happenings to bind the anticipated, the seen, and collective aspects of experience.

References Powered by Scopus

A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing

5656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition

1216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Co-operative action

650Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Text Materialities, Affordances, and the Embodied Turn in the Study of Reading

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A distributed perspective on reading: implications for education

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: An interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trasmundi, S. B., & Cowley, S. J. (2020). Reading: How Readers Beget Imagining. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531682

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

33%

Linguistics 4

33%

Arts and Humanities 3

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 56

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free