Rethinking World Parliament: Beyond the Indeterminacy of International Law

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is often assumed that global democracy will manifest itself as a world parliament. But what is a world parliament: a sovereign legislative body or just a place to talk? I argue that apart from the task of coordinating activities of functional systems, a world parliament can be a response to the indeterminacy of international law. As “possessive individuals”, sovereign states owe apparently nothing to international society, yet the rights and duties of sovereignty and consequent relations between states are necessarily conceived also in supranational terms. I situate the new proposal about world parliament in an open-ended vision of an evolving world civilisation, the global layer of which is organised along functionalist-democratic lines but requires coordination, common will-formation, and rules and principles of (meta-)governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patomäki, H. (2023). Rethinking World Parliament: Beyond the Indeterminacy of International Law. In World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures (Vol. Part F829, pp. 281–297). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32305-8_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free