Is CETA the Promised Breakthrough? Interpretation and Evolution of Fair and Equitable Treatment and (Indirect) Expropriation Provisions

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines two of the most common, and arguably the most controversial, foreign investment protection principles included in CETA, namely fair and equitable treatment and (indirect) expropriation. The chapter takes into account states’ treaty-making experiences, arbitral practice relating to the interpretation of these principles and the legal-political interplay between the two. Through this analysis, the chapter attempts to demonstrate whether or not the CETA provisions, as one of the first ʼnew-wave’ free trade agreement drafts, bear the potential of providing further clarity and advancement as to how these principles of foreign investment protection are defined, understood and applied in case law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ünüvar, G. (2020). Is CETA the Promised Breakthrough? Interpretation and Evolution of Fair and Equitable Treatment and (Indirect) Expropriation Provisions. In EU External Action in International Economic Law: Recent Trends and Developments (pp. 193–219). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-391-7_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free