Inhalation anesthesia is preferable for recording rat cardiac function using an electrocardiogram

39Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effects of inhalation anesthesia (2% isoflurane, sevoflurane, or enflurane) and intraperitoneal anesthesia with pentobarbital (65 mg/kg) were compared in rats using an electrocardiogram (ECG) and determination of blood oxygen saturation (SPO2) levels. Following inhalation anesthesia, heart rate (HR) and SPO2 were acceptable while pentobarbital anesthesia decreased HR and SPO2 significantly. This indicates that inhalation anesthesia is more preferable than pentobarbital anesthesia when evaluating cardiovascular factors. Additionally, pentobarbital significantly increased HR variability (HRV), suggesting a regulatory effect of pentobarbital on the autonomic nervous system, and resulted in a decreased response of the baro-reflex system. Propranolol or atropine had limited effects on ECG recording following pentobarbital anesthesia. Taken together, these data suggest that inhalation anesthesia is suitable for conducting hemodynamic analyses in the rat. © 2014 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murakami, M., Niwa, H., Kushikata, T., Watanabe, H., Hirota, K., Ono, K., & Ohba, T. (2014). Inhalation anesthesia is preferable for recording rat cardiac function using an electrocardiogram. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 37(5), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b14-00012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free