Does Electronic Monitoring Influence Adherence to Medication? Randomized Controlled Trial of Measurement Reactivity

63Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Methods: A total of 226 adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol were randomized to receiving their main oral glucose lowering medication in electronic containers or standard packaging. The primary outcomes were self-reported adherence measured with the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale; range 5–25) and HbA1c at 8 weeks. Results: Non-significantly higher adherence and lower HbA1c were observed in the electronic container group (differences in means, adjusting for baseline value: MARS, 0.4 [95 % CI −0.1 to 0.8, p = 0.11]; HbA1c (mmol/mol), −1.02 [−2.73 to 0.71, p = 0.25]). Conclusions: Electronic containers may lead to a small increase in adherence but this potential limitation is outweighed by their advantages. Our findings support electronic monitoring as the method of choice in research on medication adherence. (Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCT N30522359) Purpose: To test the reactive effect of electronic monitoring in a randomized controlled trial. Background: Electronic monitoring is recommended for accurate measurement of medication adherence but a possible limitation is that it may influence adherence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutton, S., Kinmonth, A. L., Hardeman, W., Hughes, D., Boase, S., Prevost, A. T., … Farmer, A. (2014). Does Electronic Monitoring Influence Adherence to Medication? Randomized Controlled Trial of Measurement Reactivity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9595-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free