The nature and worth of Michael Oakeshott’s contribution as a political thinker have long been the subject of deep disagreement within the community of Anglophone political theory. This is partly the product of a partial familiarity with Oakeshott’s corpus. During his lifetime, his body of published work had a rather slender appearance, comprising two major monographs, separated by some forty years, and two rather more accessible collections of essays on politics and history. Following his death in 1990, however, a much larger body of writings has become available. In particular, with the publication of his Notebooks, we are afforded the chance to form a nuanced and informed understanding of how the thinking in his texts interconnected, and to appreciate the range of intellectual influences and political preoccupations that characterised his work.
CITATION STYLE
Hexter, D., Kenny, M., & O’Sullivan, L. (2019, January 1). Intimations of Oakeshott: A critical reading of his ‘Notebooks, 1922–86.’ European Journal of Political Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115627559
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.