Understanding cross-country differences in exporter premia: Comparable evidence for 14 countries

148Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. Our overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity is controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. We document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of our results we find, consistent with theoretical predictions, that productivity premia are larger in countries with lower export participation rates, with more restrictive trade policies, lower per capita GDP, less effective government and worse regulatory quality, and in countries exporting to relatively more distant markets. © 2008 Kiel Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, J., Pertl, L., Schiavo, S., Muuls, M., Pisu, M., Alvarez, R., … Kneller, R. (2008). Understanding cross-country differences in exporter premia: Comparable evidence for 14 countries. Review of World Economics, 144(4), 596–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0163-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free