Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class i Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles

6Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: In the cephalometric analyses, it is observed that both SNA and SNB angles are higher or lower than normal for some skeletal Class I patients. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between low or high SNA, SNB angles, and anterior cranial base (ACB) slope. Methods: One hundred and seventeen skeletal Class I patients (45 males with a mean age of 14.5 years, 72 females with a mean age of 14.4 years) were evaluated in three groups. Group 1(n=40): Control group, individuals with normal SNA(82°±2°), and SNB(80°±2°) values. Group 2 (n=37): Patients with SNA>84° and SNB >82°, Group 3 (n=40): Patients with both SNA and SNB values lower than 78°. On the cephalometric radiographs, three angulars (SN/FH; anterior cranial base, Ba-S/FH; posterior cranial base, SN-Ba; total cranial base) and seven linear (S-FH, N-FH, Δ, Ba-S, Ba-N, Ba-A, Ba-B) measurements were performed to analyze the vertical and horizontal positions of the S and N points and thereby the ACB slope. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The ACB slope was observed to be relatively flatter in Group 2, and steeper in Group 3 (p<0.05). The location of the S and N points in the sagittal plane did not significantly affect the SNA and SNB. However, the vertical position of the S and N points was a factor determining the inclination of the ACB, therefore the SNA and SNB. Conclusion: ACB slope directly affected SNA and SNB measurements. ACB might lead to misleading results when used as a reference plane.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Camcı, H., & Salmanpour, F. (2020). Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class i Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.5152/TURKJORTHOD.2020.20017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free