Inception and ResNet: Same Training, Same Features

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the dominant technology in computer vision today. Unfortunately, it’s not clear how different from each other the best CNNs really are. This paper measures the similarity between two well-known CNNs, Inception and ResNet, in terms of the features they extract from images. We find that Inception’s features can be well approximated as an affine transformation of ResNet’s features and vice-versa. The similarity between Inception and ResNet features is surprising. Convolutional neural networks learn complex non-linear features of images, and the architectural differences between the systems suggest that these functions should take different forms. Instead, they seem to have converged on similar solutions. This suggests that the selection of the training set may be more important than the selection of the convolutional architecture.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McNeely-White, D. G., Beveridge, J. R., & Draper, B. A. (2020). Inception and ResNet: Same Training, Same Features. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 948, pp. 352–357). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free