Acceptability in timed frameworks with intermittent arguments

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this work we formalize a natural expansion of timed argumentation frameworks by considering arguments that are available with (possibly) some repeated interruptions in time, called intermittent arguments. This framework is used as a modelization of argumentation dynamics. The notion of acceptability of arguments is analyzed as the framework evolves through time, and an algorithm for computing intervals of argument defense is introduced. © 2011 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

References Powered by Scopus

5629Citations
730Readers

This article is free to access.

244Citations
60Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks

18Citations
15Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cobo, M. L., Martinez, D. C., & Simari, G. R. (2011). Acceptability in timed frameworks with intermittent arguments. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 364 AICT, pp. 202–211). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23960-1_25

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘19‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0