The origin of Lake Pavin: Two centuries of controversy

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Lake Pavin, having a circular shape, unusual size and depth, pure water and dark forest draping the slopes down to the shore, has always impressed visitors. This unusual lake garnered a fame that attracted the attention of geologists very early. After the discovery of extinct volcanoes of Auvergne by Guettard (Mém Acad Roy Sci, Paris:27-59, 1752a) in the Chaîne des Puys, naturalists and geologists quickly recognized that most of the Auvergne mountains were volcanic edifices (Desmarest, Mém Acad Roy Sci, Paris (parts 1 & 2 [published in 1774]):705-775, 1771; Dolomieu, J des Mines 7:393-420, 1797). Lake Pavin was also supposed to be of volcanic origin, but the cause of its unusual shape was controversial: according to Montlosier (Essai sur la théorie des volcans d’Auvergne. Landriot, Riom, 1788), the lake was the product of a large explosion but Legrand-d’Aussy (Voyage fait en 1787 et 1788, dans la ci-devant haute et basse Auvergne, aujourd’hui départemens du Puy-de-Dôme, du Cantal et partie de celui de la Haute-Loire. Edn. Chez le Directeur de l’Imprimerie des Sciences et arts, Rue Thérèse, près la rue Helvétius, Paris. 3 volumes 1794-1795) considered it as the result of a collapse. These two assumptions have been defended throughout the nineteenth century: Poulett Scrope (The geology and extinct volcanoes of central France., vol in-8°. Pl. and maps. 2nd edition 1858 edn. Murray, London 1827), Lecoq (Description pittoresque de l’Auvergne. Baillière, Paris, 1835) and Vimont (Annuaire du Club Alpin:337-349, 1874) advocated the explosive origin, while Lacoste (Observations sur les volcans de l’Auvergne suivies de Notes sur divers objets; recueillies dans une course minéralogique faite l’année dernière, an X. Delcros, Granier et Froin, Clermont-Ferrand, An XI, 1802-1803), Dufrénoy and Elie de Beaumont (Ann. des Mines. 3, 3, 1833) and Boule (Bull Soc Géol France XXIV:759, 1896) supported the collapse model. Other explanations have also been proposed such as a local geomorphic anomaly (Huot, Volcans in Desmarest, Nicolas: Encyclopédie méthodique. Géographie-physique, vol V. Chez Mme veuve Agasse, an III, Paris, 1828) or a glacial origin (Julien, Des phénomènes glaciaires dans le Plateau Central de la France et, en particulier, dans le Puy-de-Dôme et le Cantal. Paris, 1869; Giraud, Annales de la Station Limnologique de Besse 1:147-161, 1909). As he studied the deposits associated to the Lake Pavin, Glangeaud (C R Acad Sci Paris 162:428-430, 1916) demonstrated that explosions did produce them, an interpretation accepted by most geologists for the twentieth century and thereafter. It was not before 1973 that Camus et al. (C R Acad Sci Paris, sér D 277:629-632) reconciled the two explanations in the light of modern maar models, in which violent explosions trigger concentric collapses, which in turn enlarged the crater.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boivin, P., & Jouhannel, S. (2016). The origin of Lake Pavin: Two centuries of controversy. In Lake Pavin: History, Geology, Biogeochemistry, and Sedimentology of a Deep Meromictic Maar Lake (pp. 91–104). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39961-4_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free