Effect of some process parameters on geometric errors in twopoint incremental forming for Al-Cu-Mg Aluminum Alloy

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two point incremental forming receives widespread study with its advantages of economy and flexibility in small batch products, such as aircraft parts. Aircraft parts, however, are rigorous in their shape errors. In this paper, one real airplane part is selected and formed with different process parameters to investigate the shape error level of part. Comparing the geometric errors caused by different process parameters, such as tool diameter, step size, feed rate and tool path, it is found that the geometric errors reduce as tool diameter increases. Meanwhile, the effect of step size is not linear. Influence law of feed rate is various with different other parameters. The bidirectional tool path, having opposite processing direction at adjacent layer, reduces the errors.

References Powered by Scopus

Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal

1039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asymmetric two points incremental forming: Improving surface quality and geometric accuracy by tool path optimization

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimization of tool path in two points incremental forming

92Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Manufacture of an aerospace component with hybrid incremental forming methodology

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., Han, K., Yu, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, D. (2016). Effect of some process parameters on geometric errors in twopoint incremental forming for Al-Cu-Mg Aluminum Alloy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 734). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/734/3/032078

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

60%

Computer Science 1

20%

Materials Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0