Significance of Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization Techniques for Predictive Biomarker Studies

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) are morphology-based methods which allow direct assignment of findings to the cells of interest, e.g., cancer cells. IHC detects changes of protein expression qualitatively or as a semiquantitative measurement. Reliability of IHC-based predictive biomarkers is highly dependent on pre-analytical factors, selection of suitable antibodies, staining procedures, as well as an assessment of staining. Specific reading and scoring approaches for different tumor entities make evaluations complex, especially for evolving biomarkers in the context of immuno-oncology treatment. ISH assays are basically capable of detecting gene amplifications, large deletions, and gene fusions. Definitions of amplifications are gene and entity specific. Activating rearrangements frequently involve genes encoding receptor tyrosine kinases which can be addressed by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Most of the currently applied predictive biomarkers are based on either IHC or ISH. The number of assays is steadily growing, and great efforts are needed to achieve and maintain the highest level of reliability. Future developments will introduce multiplexing IHC and ISH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schildhaus, H. U. (2018). Significance of Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization Techniques for Predictive Biomarker Studies. In Predictive Biomarkers in Oncology: Applications in Precision Medicine (pp. 45–62). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95228-4_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free