The measurement of vitamin D: Analytical aspects

98Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the past quarter of a century, our understanding of the metabolism and mechanism of action of vitamin D has been elucidated. During this period, many metabolites of vitamin D have been identified and a small proportion of these assayed in blood. The ability to assay these vitamin D metabolites has led to a better appreciation of the pathological role that altered vitamin D metabolism plays in the development of diseases of calcium homeostasis. However, for many physicians it is not clear which vitamin D metabolites should be quantitated and what the information gained tells us. Of the four major circulating vitamin D metabolites in blood, only two, namely 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], have warranted measurement. Of these, the need for assessing serum 1,25(OH)2D is actually quite limited and should therefore not be considered as part of the standard vitamin D testing regimen. 25OHB, on the other hand, provides us with the single best assessment of vitamin D nutritional status and should be the only vitamin D assay typically ordered for this reason. Which of the many methods that are available should a laboratory use for quantitating either of these vitamin D metabolites? Early methods required large volumes of blood, organic solvent extractions, and extensive purification of the vitamin D metabolites prior to assay. Today, these time-consuming and costly methods have given way to a range of radioimmunoassays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that can accurately and conveniently provide important information concerning an individual's vitamin D status. This review will consider when vitamin D measurements should be undertaken and how best to perform such assays.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zerwekh, J. E. (2004, July). The measurement of vitamin D: Analytical aspects. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563041201464

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free