Quantitative Analysis of Iron-Containing Protein Myoglobin in Different Foodstuffs by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

11Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Quantitative determination was made of the iron-containing protein myoglobin in a range of different foods, including meat, processed meat, fish, and shellfish, by liquid chromatography coupled to a double-focusing sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The concentration of myoglobin determined in the samples ranged from 0 to 6.5 mg/kg, and the analytical precision (coefficient of variation) for the analysis of 8 replicate raw steak extracts was 2.1%. By using a double-focusing ICP-MS instrument, direct on-line detection of the most abundant iron isotope 56Fe was possible without interference from a major polyatomic interference ( 40Ar16O). Separation of myoglobin from other iron-containing compounds was facilitated by use of a gel filtration column (TSK Gel G2000SW) and Tris buffer (pH 7.2). The Chromatographic column was coupled directly to the nebulizer of the ICP-MS instrument by a short piece of PEEK® tubing. To ensure sufficient quality control throughout the study, a raw beefsteak sample was developed as an in-house reference material. The concentration of the heme-iron-containing protein myoglobin in this sample was determined by the developed method and independently by a conventional spectrophotometric method. The agreement between the 2 analytical techniques was very good. The detection limit (3 times the signal/noise ratio for a blank) of the reported method for myoglobin was 0.85 ng Fe/L.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harrington, C. F., Elahi, S., Merson, S. A., & Ponnampalavanar, P. (2004). Quantitative Analysis of Iron-Containing Protein Myoglobin in Different Foodstuffs by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Journal of AOAC International, 87(1), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/87.1.253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free